Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 52
Filter
2.
Inflamm Res ; 72(4): 875-878, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2315746

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hypereosinophilic dermatitis (HED) is a subtype of hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). Glucocorticoids are preferred for treatment but carry substantial side effect profiles. Symptoms of HED may recur after systemic glucocorticoid tapering. As an interleukin-4 receptor (IL-4Rα) monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-4 (IL-4) and interleukin-13 (IL-13), dupilumab might be an efficacious adjuvant therapy for HED. METHOD: We report a young male diagnosed with HED who suffered from erythematous papules with pruritus for over five years. Once reducing the dosage of glucocorticoid was, his skin lesions relapsed. RESULTS: After using dupilumab, the patient's condition significantly improved with the glucocorticoid dosing decreased successfully. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we report a new application of dupilumab in HED patients, especially with difficulties in reducing the glucocorticoid dose.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic , Glucocorticoids , Humans , Male , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Interleukin-13 , Treatment Outcome
3.
Australas J Dermatol ; 64(1): 146-150, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2251847

ABSTRACT

Recent phase 2b and phase 3 clinical trials support the safety and efficacy of the selective Janus kinase (JAK)-1 inhibitor upadacitinib (UPA) in the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD). However, to date, there is little experience with UPA therapy for AD in Australia. We report findings from a retrospective study to better understand the therapeutic response and side effects noted in a single-centre Australian cohort.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Janus Kinase Inhibitors , Humans , Australia , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Janus Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
4.
Immunotherapy ; 14(14): 1149-1164, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2268835

ABSTRACT

In the past decade, the emergence of biologics targeting human cytokine networks has advanced a new era in atopic dermatitis therapy. Dupilumab, in particular, the most widely studied and used IL-4/IL-13 inhibitor, has been considered a milestone in the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. In addition to the IL-4 and IL-13 pathways, many other cytokines and receptors have been newly targeted as therapeutic options. In this review, the authors provide an overview of the approved and tested biologics and JAK inhibitors for the treatment of atopic dermatitis, including their advantages and limitations.


Subject(s)
Biological Products , Dermatitis, Atopic , Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacology , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Humans , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Immunotherapy , Interleukin-13 , Interleukin-4
7.
JAMA Dermatol ; 158(11): 1327-1330, 2022 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2058992

ABSTRACT

This case series describes the outcomes of COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with atopic dermatitis who have been treated with tralokinumab.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Dermatitis, Atopic , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Vaccination
8.
Drugs R D ; 22(3): 245-252, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2031052

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in atopic dermatitis (AD) have been defined in clinical trials, but no real-world data are currently available. We aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of upadacitinib in a real-world AD patient cohort that mostly included patients who failed the available systemic therapies, including dupilumab. METHODS: Prospective cohort study collecting data on upadacitinib-treated AD adult patients completing at least 16 weeks of therapy. RESULTS: Forty-three patients showed rapid and marked response to upadacitinib with significant reduction of all disease severity scores since the first follow-up visit. At week 16, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) 75, EASI 90, and EASI 100 response was observed in 97.5%, 82.1%, and 69.2% of patients, respectively. EASI 90 response reflected the achievement of a clear or almost clear condition (POEM 0-2), self-evaluated by 79.5% of patients. Patients' quality of life improved as suggested by the achievement of DLQI 0/1 by 38.5% of patients at week 4, and by 76.9% at week 16. CONCLUSION: Elevated effectiveness and favorable safety of upadacitinib were confirmed in patients unresponsive to dupilumab, who were not included in upadacitinib trials.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic , Adult , Cohort Studies , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring , Humans , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
9.
Dermatol Ther ; 35(7): e15573, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1832028

ABSTRACT

During the SARS-COV-2 pandemic, using face masks became mandatory in many countries. Although evidence suggests that masks can exacerbate several inflammatory skin diseases, few studies focus on their real impact on eczema localized to the face in atopic dermatitis (AD) patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate facial eczema prevalence during pandemic and its psychological impact in AD patients pre-assessed for systemic treatment and/or in therapy with dupilumab. This study includes 71 patients affected by moderate-severe AD, treated with dupilumab at SCDU of Dermatology in Novara, Italy. We calculated the number of subjects with facial involvement in pre- and post-pandemic periods and the related localization trend. We evaluated, in the two groups, clinical and psychological indicators recorded at each visit and the score modifications during the observational period. No statistically significant differences were observed in facial eczema prevalence, between pre- and post-pandemic periods (p = 0.7618) and in facial eczema remission among the two groups (p = 0.1903). In post-pandemic period, psychological scores were significantly lower (DLQI and HADS respectively with p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0025) and the reduction in EASI score during observational period was significantly greater (p = 0.0001). Our analysis revealed a potential protective effect of masks on face eczema, suggesting that they could enhance dupilumab efficacy. Face masks, covering sensitive areas, can positively contribute to mental distress in patients with facial eczema, and being associated with a lower allergic diseases incidence may sustain dupilumab in reducing AD severity.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Dermatitis, Atopic , Eczema , Facial Dermatoses , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Dermatitis, Atopic/complications , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Dermatitis, Atopic/epidemiology , Eczema/complications , Facial Dermatoses/complications , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
10.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 36(5): 632, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1816588
13.
Dermatol Ther ; 35(6): e15476, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1769717

ABSTRACT

The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the safety of dupilumab use in the management of atopic dermatitis (AD) during the current pandemic regarding the risk and the hazards of COVID-19 infection. Seven databases (Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, Virtual Health Library, PubMed, System for Information on Gray Literature in Europe, and The New York Academy of Medicine) were searched for eligible studies from inception until November 24, 2021. The quality of evidence was rated using the National Institute of Health and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tool. Meta-analysis was performed when the outcome is presented ≥2 studies. A total of 12 papers including 1611 AD patients were included in the study. The prevalence of COVID-19 in AD treated with dupilumab was 3.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7-5.8). COVID-19 symptoms were reported by five patients who were presented with one or more of the following symptoms (fatigue, loss of taste and smell, runny nose, conjunctivitis, gastrointestinal symptoms, fever, cough, and dyspnea). Only three cases of COVID-19 were hospitalized with a prevalence of 4.5%, while no patients with COVID-19 died. Dupilumab is safe regarding the risk and the hazards of COVID-19 in AD patients. Thus, based on these results continuation of dupilumab in AD patients is recommended, since dupilumab seems to be safe and crucial for a better disease outcome.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Dermatitis, Atopic , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Atopic/chemically induced , Dermatitis, Atopic/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Humans , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
14.
J Dermatolog Treat ; 33(5): 2578-2586, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1692399

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dupilumab has been approved to treat moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis; however, the data in a real-world setting are still limited. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab. METHODS: This was a real-life Czech multicenter retrospective study from patients treated with dupilumab for severe AD. RESULTS: A total of 360 patients were included. At 16 weeks, 66.6, 34.1, and 5.5% of patients achieved EASI75/90 and EASI100, respectively. Improvement continued with the time, and the proportion of patients with EASI75/90 and EASI100 increased to 89.5, 55.6, and 12.9% after one year of treatment and reached 95.8, 60.4, and 27.1% in the second year of therapy, respectively. A significant reduction was observed in the DLQI scores. The most common adverse events were infections in 5.8% of patients, followed by ocular complications in 2.5% of patients. Persistence rates were 98.2% at four months to 93.1% at month 24, and lack of effectiveness was the most common reason for discontinuation. CONCLUSION: This real-life study confirmed the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in a real-life setting during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our study revealed a higher frequency of infections and a lower conjunctivitis frequency than other real-life studies and clinical trials.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Dermatitis, Atopic , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Czech Republic , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Humans , Pandemics , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
17.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 21(10): 4781-4787, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1626059

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Adult atopic dermatitis (AD), especially adult-onset type appears to have different clinical manifestations. Dupilumab is an IL-4 receptor antagonist used in patients with moderate and severe atopic dermatitis, aged 12 years and older and it works by inhibiting the IL-4 and IL-13 signaling pathway. The purpose of our study is to retrospectively investigate the side effect profile and drug efficacy of thirteen adult patients who received dupilumab treatment and to evaluate the drug use status and the results during the COVID-19 pandemicour stuAdult atopic dermatitis (AD), especially adult-onset type appears to have different clinical manifestations. Dupilumab is an IL-4 receptor antagonist used in patients with moderate and severe atopic dermatitis, aged 12 years and older and it works by inhibiting the IL-4 and IL-13 signaling pathway. The purpose of our study is to retrospectively investigate the side effect profile and drug efficacy of thirteen adult patients who received dupilumab treatment and to evaluate the drug use status and the results during the COVID-19 pandemicAdult atopic dermatitis (AD), especially adult-onset type appears to have different clinical manifestations. Dupilumab is an IL-4 receptor antagonist used in patients with moderate and severe atopic dermatitis, aged 12 years and older and it works by inhibiting the IL-4 and IL-13 signaling pathway. The purpose of dy is to retrospectively investigate the side effect profile and drug efficacy of thirteen adult patients who received dupilumab treatment and to evaluate the drug use status and the results during the COVID-19 pandemicAdult atopic dermatitis (AD), especially adult-onset type appears to have different clinical manifestations. Dupilumab is an IL-4 receptor antagonist used in patients with moderate and severe atopic dermatitis, aged 12 years and older and it works by inhibiting the IL-4 and IL-13 signaling pathway. The purpose of our study is to retrospectively investigate the side effect profile and drug efficacy of thirteen adult patients who received dupilumab treatment and to evaluate the drug use status and the results during the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients with clinical and/or histopathological diagnoses of atopic dermatitis who received dupilumab treatment and were subsequently followed up in Bezmialem Vakif University dermatology outpatient clinic between April 2019 and October 2021 were included in our study.Patient files were reviewed, and patients were interviewed in-person or by phone to learn about the COVID-19 contagion.Descriptive statistical analysis was performed with Microsoft Excel, and the data obtained were calculated as mean and percentage. RESULTS: All of our patients responded to the treatment after one course of dupilumab injection and also CRP and LDH levels decreased. Conjunctivitis side effect was found at a slightly higher rate than in previous clinical studies. The treatment was continued during the COVID-19 pandemic in most patients. Meanwhile, four patients had COVID-19 infection, but one of them was not using dupixent at that time. CONCLUSION: We can conclude that dupilumab is an effective and safe therapy for patients with severe AD also in cases of severe infections.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Dermatitis, Atopic , Adult , Humans , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Dermatitis, Atopic/diagnosis , Interleukin-13/therapeutic use , Interleukin-4/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Pandemics , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Receptors, Interleukin-4/therapeutic use
18.
Int J Mol Sci ; 22(24)2021 Dec 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1595807

ABSTRACT

The IL-4 and IL-13 cytokine pathways play integral roles in stimulating IgE inflammation, with the IL-4 cytokine being a major cytokine in the etiology of thunderstorm asthma, atopic dermatitis, and allergic rhinitis. The increasing prevalence of thunderstorm asthma in the younger population and the lessening efficacy of corticosteroids and other anti-inflammatories has created a need for more effective pharmaceuticals. This review summarizes the IL-4 and IL-13 pathways while highlighting and discussing the current pathway inhibitors aimed at treating thunderstorm asthma and atopic dermatitis, as well as the potential efficacy of peptide therapeutics in this field.


Subject(s)
Allergens/adverse effects , Asthma/immunology , Dermatitis, Atopic/immunology , Interleukin-4/metabolism , Allergens/immunology , Asthma/drug therapy , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Gene Expression Regulation/drug effects , Humans , Interleukin-13/metabolism , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Signal Transduction/drug effects
19.
Clin Dermatol ; 39(6): 1083-1087, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1588082

ABSTRACT

Data on the tolerability and response to biologic therapies for type 2 immune disorders in the context of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are currently lacking. Our survey aimed at assessing the adherence of patients to dupilumab therapy and the risk of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. A total of 80 patients with atopic dermatitis treated with dupilumab completed a web-based survey. Of the 80 patients, 7 discontinued dupilumab owing to concerns and difficulties related to COVID-19. Our sample was highly susceptible to viral infection owing to the frequency of risk factors including living in high SARS-CoV-2 burden areas, such as in Northern Italy; having comorbidities, such as asthma, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease; and being of advanced age. Older patients in our sample are particularly exposed to the risk of COVID-19-related cytokine storm, triggered by excessive interleukin-4 production and type 2 immune response. One patient contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection without the progression of COVID-19 despite continuing scheduled dupilumab treatment. Because evidence on the appropriate management of biologic therapy in the setting of COVID-19 is lacking, the collection of clinical data from patients in treatment with dupilumab is a valuable addition to current clinical practice. Our survey provides a contribution to the understanding of the tolerability and response to dupilumab during COVID-19 and suggests a feasible and effective approach to patients being treated with biologics even when social distancing is required.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Dermatitis, Atopic , Eczema , Cytokine Release Syndrome , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
20.
Dermatol Ther ; 35(1): e15192, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1506757

ABSTRACT

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common, chronic inflammatory condition with a substantial negative impact on the quality of life. Dupilumab, the first biologic approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD, binds IL-4Rα and inhibits signaling of both IL-4 and IL-13. This study aimed to determine the real-life effectiveness and safety of dupilumab treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. The results of the study indicates high effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in real-life conditions. The treatment was continued during the COVID-19 pandemic in most of the patients without any adverse outcome. The rate of conjunctivitis was higher compared to clinical trials, nevertheless treatment was not discontinued in any patients due to adverse effects.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Dermatitis, Atopic , Adult , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , COVID-19 , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Humans , Pandemics , Quality of Life , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL